But what is the 'Wow!-signal'? Well, think of the movie Contact and you are half-way there. Besides having a track featured on the next limited Exposure series EP, he steps in with a 3 tracker for the Mood Series called 'Wow!-signal'! When searching for an appropriate name for this album Armin happened to be reading an article on a young astronomer finding a possible source for the famed 'Wow!-signal'. Armin Bender has been really impressing us all with his production since he's been with us. If we don't see another event, we can rule out stochastic repeaters as a likely cause.Mood Series #69 is now out for you to enjoy. If the Wow! signal was a stochastic repeater, then we'll likely catch a new event. This is good to know since we can now specifically observe the regions during the most likely event periods. So, knowing of one burst event, and knowing when other burst events haven't occurred, the authors calculate the times at which future events are most likely. It takes into account not just how often something has occurred, but how those events changed over time. It looks at the pattern of events to predict specific outcomes. It's more than just calculating the odds of a likely event. The authors look at when an unobserved burst might have occurred, and apply Bayesian statistics to calculate when a future burst might occur.īayesian statistics is subtle but powerful. But the idea isn't as silly as it sounds. It sounds like the authors are arguing that it must be a non-random repeater because we've never observed it repeat. We've never seen the Wow! signal repeat, and we've proved it can't be repeating periodically, but maybe it's been repeating non-randomly such that we've never observed it. On the face of it, this seems like a silly idea. Astrophysical processes can be stochastic in a similar way. We know where they generally happen, know they will happen again, but predicting exactly when is nigh on impossible. Rather than having a measurable period, stochastic repeaters repeat somewhat randomly. A stochastic repeater is a bit different. Astronomers have considered this idea, and have made observations that rule out a source with a regular periodicity. Things like variable stars or fast radio bursts can have a predictable variability. In this work, the authors argue that the source could be some kind of stochastic repeater. A scattered signal is possible, but the strength of the signal would be unusual, and the frequency of the Wow! signal is within a range where transmissions are restricted.Īpplying Bayesian statistics to a likely outcome. But a plane wouldn't be in range for more than 72 seconds, and there is no record of such a flight. The most basic idea is that the signal was of terrestrial origin, perhaps a plane passing overhead, or a radio signal scattered off space debris. Several natural origins have been proposed, but all of them are a bit lacking. By the time astronomers could go back to observe the source, the event was long over.īut despite having just one observation, the Wow! signal is considered the strongest candidate for an extraterrestrial signal. Because of this, the signal was only discovered days after the event when recorded observations were reviewed. Astronomers simply set it up, and it would run on its own, recording the strength of signals as it goes. The reason the Wow! signal lasts 72 seconds is that's how long it took the source to sweep across Big Ear's observation range.īig Ear was also a passive telescope. Rather than being able to track radio signals like most modern radio telescopes, Big Ear was set to a particular elevation and relied on Earth's rotation to scan across the sky. Our knowledge of the signal is limited given the design of Big Ear. Observed on 15 August 1977 by the Big Ear radio telescope at Ohio University, the signal was a strong, continuous, narrow band radio signal lasting at least 72 seconds.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |